Pages

Sunday, May 12, 2013

Third Sunday after Easter, April 21, 2013



Third Sunday after Easter, April 21, 2013
Epistle 1 Peter 2: 11-19       Gospel John. 16: 16-22


            “Amen, amen I say to you, that you shall lament and weep . . . but your sorrow will be turned into joy . . . and your joy no man shall take from you.” That joy our Lord speaks of is the Hope of Christians.

            The holy man Job tells us that life is a continuous misery. Where do we see so much misery? Go down the street from house to house. In the first house they suffer the loss of their fortune, the result of an injustice. In the second, there’s a illness which confines a person to a bed of suffering. In the third, a wife is in sorrow because of a drinking and abusive husband. In the fourth house, a poor older couple have been thrown upon the charity of the world by their ungrateful children. In the next is a man accused of misdeeds which he did not commit. In the next is a family in deep sorrow because of a death of a child, a parent or grandparent. You will find the Cross of Christ wherever you look.

            If we look at life from a worldly standpoint it will seem miserable indeed. But if we look at life from the standpoint of our Faith, we see that we are miserable only so long as we brood over and complain about our troubles. Why? Because we allow our thoughts to drag us down and not carry us up. A poor man in the misery of his poverty will not think of those who are gravely ill and worse off than himself. No, he may think of those who are very wealthy, enjoying the pleasures of the world. This breeds envy and makes the poor man’s poverty and misery ten times worse. A man suffering a painful illness does not think of the souls in hell who suffer intense and eternal pain for their sins. Instead, he thinks about the lucky few who have never had a sick day in their lives, and so he considers his suffering unbearable.

What is the consequence of this? Our grumbling and complaining deprives us of all the merits which we might gain in heaven by offering our suffering to God in atonement for our sins along with our prayer for forgiveness. With this we have Hope, but it is our lack of submission to the will of God, our lack of confidence in God, that makes us so unhappy.

            Look up to heaven to see the good Father Who has a glorious mansion ready for you in His kingdom. God chastises us in order to heal the wounds which we inflict upon ourselves. God sends us suffering in order  to crown us with everlasting glory. Look to Blessed Job to learn how to pick up your Cross every day. Job lost all his possessions, a house fell on his children and killed them, fire from heaven destroyed most of his livestock and robbers drove off the rest. Job’s response was not despair, merely, “Alas, the hand of the Lord lies heavy upon me!” Deprived of everything, Job lay on a dunghill for years without any help or consolation, his body covered with sores. He was deserted even by his wife who mocked him: “Why don’t you pray to your God for death so you will be delivered from all this misery? Don’t you see how the God you served so faithfully now tortures you?” Job simply said to her, “ You speak foolishly. If we have received good things at the hand of God, why should we not accept the bad?”

            Some might respond, “God is our Father and loves us with an infinite love. I cannot understand why He would send such suffering to us.” This is the same as asking, how is it possible that a father can chastise his own child or a physician give a bitter medicine to his patient? Do you think it’s better to allow a child to grow up unrestrained and without discipline or to punish his wrongdoing in order to lead him to virtue and through virtue to heaven? Or is it better for a physician to allow his patient to die rather than prescribe a bitter but lifesaving medicine? God must chastise us. Jesus said the kingdom of heaven would be only for those who suffer and fight until the end (Matthew 24: 13). He is the Way, the Truth and the Life, so when Jesus said that He spoke truly. We can persevere, we can stick to it, and all our lives we can take heart in the words of Christ at John 16: 33: “In this world you shall have distress: but have confidence, I have overcome the world.” +

Last Wednesday was the Feast of the Solemnity of St. Joseph and St. John Chrysostom in a sermon spoke about the virginal conception and about St. Joseph’s role in the Holy Family at that time. It was the custom in those days for betrothed brides to live in the house of their bridegroom, and it would seem Mary lived with Joseph then. This is not permitted today. But in this situation we can find an answer to the question: why didn’t the virginal conception take place before Mary was wedded? It was in order that the mystery of this would be kept hidden for a while, and that Mary might escape all danger of evil suspicion,  because their neighbors would naturally assume her conception took place in the normal manner in marriage.
Joseph  knew he and Mary were celibate, so he had a right, looking at this situation through the eyes of the world,  to be moved by jealousy at the father of the child. But Joseph did not look at the world this way at all. He saw everything through the eyes of his great faith, so he did not send his espoused away from him, and did not brand her with scandal, but took Mary as his own and cherished her after she had conceived.
St. Matthew tells as at Ch. 1, v. 19 that Joseph was a just man, and because he was a just man it is clear to us that he would not have kept Mary in his house or provided for her needs if he had not clearly known that she had conceived by the Holy Ghost.
Matthew brings testimony from another source to confirm the virginal conception. In case anyone would say, how can it be proved that Mary conceive by the Holy Ghost? Who saw it? Who even heard of such a thing happening?  It’s as if Matthew is saying: if you won’t believe me, then believe the grief of Joseph and what Joseph did afterwards which confirms the virginal conception.  
St. Matthew writes: “Joseph, her husband, being a just man . . .” To be just, as the word is used here, implies a full growth of righteousness which comes from loving and serving God with all our heart, all our mind and all our strength. It is because Joseph was just that he was of a mind to put Mary away privately. This was the grief of Joseph, that this unbelievable situation presented itself to him. While he was thinking about all this Joseph was told the secret of the virgin conception by an angel in a dream, in case anyone should have doubts about what he did after he knew the secret.
If Mary had sinned with another man she would have deserved to be denounced and punished under the authority of the Law of Moses, but St. Joseph, now knowing that the child she carried was by the Holy Ghost, loved and cared for Mary as his wife, not condemning or denouncing her.
We see in St. Joseph then a man full of spiritual understanding and free from the tyranny of suspicion. Joseph was so pure, and free from that kind of jealousy, that he would not cause Mary even the slightest grief. And although Joseph lived under the Law of the Old Covenant, his spiritual understanding was above that Law, because now that the Reign of Grace was approaching it was fitting that there should be a shining example of a more magnificent and holy spirituality than was commonly seen under the yoke of the Law of Moses.  +++


We Celebrate the Tridentine Latin Mass

Solemnity of St. Joseph, April 17, 2013



Solemnity of St. Joseph, April 17, 2013
Epistle, Genesis 49: 22-26      Gospel, Luke 3: 21-23

St. John Chrysostom wrote about the virgin birth, and in particular about St. Joseph’s role in the Holy Family at this time.
It was the custom in those days for betrothed brides to live in the house of their bridegroom, and it would seem Mary lived with Joseph then. In this situation we can find an answer to the question: why didn’t the virgin conception take place before Mary was wedded? It was in order that the mystery of this would be kept hidden for a while, and that the Virgin Mary might escape all danger of evil suspicion,  because their neighbors would assume her conception took place in the normal manner in marriage.
Joseph  knew he and Mary were celibate,  so he had the best right, looking at this situation through the eyes of the world,  to be moved by jealousy at who the father of the child was. But Joseph did not look at the world this way. He saw everything through the eyes of his great faith, so he did not send his espoused away from him, and he did not brand her with scandal, but he took Mary as his own and cherished her after she had conceived.
Because we know that Joseph was a just man, as St. Matthew tells as at Ch. 1, v. 19, it is clear to us that he would not have kept her in his house or provided for her needs if he had not clearly come to know that she had conceived by the Holy Ghost.
St. Matthew brings testimony from another source to confirm this. In case anyone would say how can it be proved that Mary conceive by the Holy Ghost? Who saw it? Who ever heard of such a thing happening?  It’s as if Matthew is saying: if you won’t believe me, then believe the grief of Mary’s husband, Joseph, and what Joseph did afterwards which confirms the story.
St. Matthew writes: “Joseph, her husband, being a just man . . .” To be just, as the word is used here, implies a full growth of righteousness which comes from loving and serving God with all our heart, all our mind and all our strength. It is because Joseph was just that he was of a mind to put Mary away privately. This was the grief of Joseph, that this unbelievable situation presented itself to him. But while he was thinking about all this he was told the secret of the virgin conception by an angel in a dream, in case anyone should have doubts about what he did after he knew the secret.
If Mary had sinned with another man she would have deserved to be denounced and punished under the authority of the Law of Moses, but St. Joseph, now knowing that the child she carried was by the Holy Ghost, did not condemn her and did not denounce her.
Here we see in St. Joseph a man full of spiritual understanding and free from the tyranny of suspicion. Joseph was so pure, and free from that kind of jealousy that he would not cause Mary even the slightest grief. And although Joseph lived under the Law of the Old Covenant, his spiritual understanding was above that Law, because now that the Reign of Grace was approaching  it was fitting that there should be a shining example of a more magnificent and holy spirituality than was commonly seen under the Law of Moses.
St. Joseph, pray for us. +++
We Celebrate the Tridentine Latin Mass

Second Sunday after Easter, April 14, 2013



Second Sunday after Easter, April 14, 2013
Good Shepherd Sunday
(John 10: 11-16)

            Our Lord tells us in today’s Gospel, “I am the good shepherd,” and in the next sentence He tells us what makes Him so: “The good shepherd giveth his life for his sheep.” Jesus is the Good Shepherd by His nature. We are called upon to imitate Him to become good shepherds. When we marry, for example, we give up our independence. When we have children, we give up our time and money to raise them. Our spouse and children are our sheep. When we give up something for their benefit, we are Good Shepherds, giving up a part of our lives for them.
                                                                                                                                                                              
  Today is very important to Christians. Jesus knew that He would return to His Father, but He would not abandon the children that He was going to die for. So today our Lord and Master begins His work of establishing and consolidating His Church by calling Himself the Good Shepherd. He would later give it the pastor, Peter the Rock, the shepherd who would govern it until the end of time. is work of establishing and consolidHLet's go to the city of Caesarea Philippi, at Matthew 16: 18 where Jesus asked His Disciples, “Who do men say that the Son of Man is?” Various answers were given, but Simon said, “Thou art Christ, the Son of the living God.” Jesus blessed him , “Blessed art thou, Simon Bar-Jona,” because He knew His Father had revealed this to him, and Christ immediately told him that from that time forward he was not to be Simon, but Peter, which means the rock. In Aramaic the word is Cephas, in Greek Petros, in Latin Petrus, in English Peter – and they all mean “rock.”  St. Paul acknowledges Cephas in Galatians and Corinthians. Peter is not a name without meaning. Cephas, Petros, Petrus, Peter – in all languages means the rock. So Jesus was telling St. Peter “Thou art the rock, and upon this rock I will build My church.”

Going back 800 years before Christ, Isaias spoke of Christ under the name of a Rock, a Cornerstone:  “Therefore, thus saith the Lord God: Behold, I will lay a stone in the foundation of Sion, a tried stone, a corner-stone, a precious stone, founded in the foundation.” (Isaias 28: 16) When Jesus conferred on Simon his title of the Rock, the cornerstone, Jesus is telling us and Peter the Rock that he was to have something in common with Himself, something that the other Apostles were not to have. Because right after He blessed Simon, He said, “You are Peter, you are the rock; and upon this rock I will build my church.” Christians acknowledge that Jesus Christ is the foundation stone of the Church, but here is Jesus, the Son of God, telling Simon that he is the rock and upon this rock, Peter the rock, He will build His Church. To build a church on earth is to build an organization that operates within, of, by and for mankind. In all organizations of men, someone must be in charge. This is true even in those religious sects that do not recognize priests or ministers; someone, or some group, is always in charge. In the Church that Jesus was going to build, Peter is that person who is placed in charge. “Thou art Peter, the rock, and upon this rock I will build my Church,” – this is Peter’s appointment as the leader of the Apostles. The other Apostles that day drank this in. They did not question it, Judas perhaps excepted. Further, if “the gates of hell shall not prevail against it” then upon the death of Peter, someone else had to be chosen to be the leader of Christ’s Church, the person in charge, the person with the final authority.

Our Lord continues, telling Peter, “And I will give to thee the keys to the kingdom of heaven.” In the language of the Jews of that day “keys” signify the power of governing. Isaias 22: 22 speaks of Sobna, scribe of King Ezechias, and in charge of the Temple, that he, Sobna, will be replaced by Eliacim. Isaias says “And I will lay the key to the house of David upon his shoulder . . .” Eliacim was appointed master over all servants in the palace. Such is the nature of the keys given to Peter, the chief servant.  From the Catholic Encyclopedia, under Kingdom of God, is a discussion of the Kingdom of Heaven. “As men grew to understand the Divinity of Christ they grew to see that the kingdom of God was also that of Christ — it was here that the faith of the good thief excelled: ‘Lord, remember me when thou shalt come into thy kingdom.’ So, too, as men realized that this kingdom stood for a certain tone of mind, and saw that this peculiar spirit was enshrined in the Church, they began to speak of the Church as ‘the kingdom of God’; (Colossians 1:13; 1 Thessalonians 2:12; Apocalypse 1:6-9 and 5:10) The kingdom was regarded as Christ's and He presents it to the Father; (1 Corinthians 15: 23-28; 2 Timothy 4:1). The kingdom of God means, then, the ruling of God in our hearts; it means those principles which separate us from the kingdom of the world and the devil; it means the benign sway of grace; it means the Church as that Divine institution whereby we may make sure of attaining the spirit of Christ and so win the ultimate kingdom of God. See Matthew 13 where, in a series of parables Jesus describes the “kingdom of heaven” as His Church. So by saying to Peter, “I will give to thee the keys to the kingdom of heaven,” Like Eliacim, Peter is made chief servant, under Christ the King, and in charge of Christ’s Church.

            After Jesus had been crucified and rose from the dead the time came for Him to make good on that promise to build His Church. So we jump forward to the time near the end when Jesus appeared to the Apostles on the shores of the Sea of Galilee. He provides them with dinner and after eating He says to Peter, “Simon, son of John, lovest thou me?”  (John 21: 15-17) Jesus did not call him Peter, but Simon, so the other Apostles would note the transition between the earlier promise of establishing this Rock as the foundation of His Church, and the actual fulfillment of that promise. Peter, with his usual eagerness answers, “Yea, Lord, thou knowest that I love thee.” Jesus commands him, “Feed my lambs.” Then He repeats the question, “Simon, Son of John, lovest thou me?” Again Peter gives the same answer. The others are respectfully listening to this dialog and see plainly that Peter is again made an object of Jesus' partiality, and that he is receiving something which they are not receiving. They remember what happened at Caesarea Philippi, where Jesus said to him, “Thou art the rock, and upon this rock I will build my church.” A third time then, Jesus asks Peter, “Simon, son of John, lovest thou me?” Peters answers again, perhaps more humbly, “Lord, thou knowest all things. Thou knowest that I love thee.” Then, making Peter's authority complete, Jesus pronounces these imposing words: “Feed my sheep.” Peter is made shepherd by Him Who calls Himself the Good Shepherd. Giving Peter twice the command to “Feed my lambs” did not make him the complete shepherd, but when Christ tells Peter to “Feed my sheep,” the whole flock is then subjected to Peter's authority.

The time of Jesus' visible presence on Earth is coming to an end, and there on the shores of the Sea of Galalee Peter is proclaimed the visible head of Christ's Church. Is the Church a building? Peter is the foundation-stone. Is the Church a kingdom? Peter has the keys, the authority to rule it. Is the Church a fold? Peter is the shepherd, the chief servant.

Now we return to today's Gospel, which ends with the words: “and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd.” These are Christ's words, the words of God, so we know that if His Church is to be one fold it must have one supreme shepherd. Although it is popular today to claim that the Church of Christ is composed of all the Christian churches, this claim simply doesn't stand up to an examination of the Bible and of the history that followed.

The Figure of the Good Shepherd is the most perfect human image given to us of the whole divine plan of our restoration to God by means of the Word Incarnate. It is the most complete, the most tender and the most authoritative image since it is given to us by Jesus, Who is God Himself. We live today in an Age of Disobedience, so it is important for priests and laymen alike to “stand fast in the Lord,” as St. Paul expressed to the Thessalonians. The ancient Jews, when disobedient to God's Word, “went aside after their own inventions.” (Psalm 105: 39) That same thing is happening  today with Catholics who aren’t Catholics and thousands of Christian sects each with its own shepherd. +++

In his City of God, St. Augustine makes these remarks about the Catholic Church:

“Here we notice three incredible things. (1) It is incredible that Christ rose from the dead, (2) that this was believed around the world and (3) that a small number of men from the lower rungs of society persuaded even wise men of the truth of the Resurrection. Many refuse to believe the first; they see the worldwide spread of the Church and they can only account for it by admitting the third, that obscure and ignorant men were responsible for its spread. If Christ’s Resurrection is too incredible to believe, why does the world believe it? Those people who will not believe that the Apostles performed miracles in testimony of His Resurrection ask us to believe in an even greater miracle – that the whole world did believe without a miracle.”

We Celebrate the Traditional Tridentine Latin Mass


Low Sunday, April 7, 2013
(1st Sunday after Easter)
 
Epistle, 1 John 5: 4-10          Gospel, John 20: 19-31
            Today is the Octave of the New Pasch, the day of light, which is Easter Sunday. Our Lord’s Resurrection on a Sunday takes the place of the Jewish Sabbath, and from that day on the first day of the week is to be kept holy. Christ’s second appearance to His Apostles was also on a Sunday, and is the subject of today’s Gospel. Later, the Holy Ghost descended upon the Apostles and the women in the upper room on Pentecost Sunday, which is the birthday of the Church. Today, Jesus wins the perfect faith of His Apostles; especially in His dealing with the one we call “Doubting Thomas.”
Thomas is so much like today's rationalists who think that human reason is the final authority in all matters. What faith Thomas had was a scientific deduction and not a generous longing after God and supernatural truth. People of this faith are afraid of believing too much and are satisfied with little fragments of Truth. Psalm 11 describes them well when it says: “Truths are decayed from among the children of men.”
            Contrast Thomas with St. John at the grave of Jesus on Easter morning.  John allowed Peter to enter first. [John 20: 8] “Then that other disciple also went in, who came first to the sepulcher [John]: and he saw, and believed.” All the Apostles should have believed from the moment they heard that Christ's body was not in the tomb. They lived with Him for three years. They had seen the undeniable miracles He performed. He told them shortly before His Passion that He was about to be taken, that He would be scourged, spit upon and put to death. He told them that He would rise on the third day. But it is one of the consequences of the original sin of our first parents, Adam and Eve, that we hesitate to give ourselves over to perfect faith. So God makes further advances to us out of His love for us.
            Thomas had heard the events told by Magdalene and Peter and the other Apostles and the two disciples who met Christ on the Road to Emmaus, but he would not change his opinion. We have no problem accepting the testimony of a trustworthy witness in a court of law. But if someone gives testimony touching on the supernatural, then we find a hundred objections! Jesus told all of them that “. . . in me you may have peace. In the world you shall have distress: but have confidence, I have overcome the world.” [John 16: 33] Thomas had not yet “overcome the world” and its way of thinking, because he had not faith. St. John reminds us of the power and potential of faith in his First Epistle: “For whatsoever is born of God, overcometh the world: and this is the victory which overcometh the world, our faith.” (1 John 5: 4] Thomas’ punishment for his sin of disbelief was merciful, but severe. His punishment was to have these words said to him: “Because thou hast seen me, Thomas, thou hast believed; blessed are they that have not seen, and have believed.” (John 20: 29)
            When Mary Magdalene and the other women told the Apostles what had happened at the tomb, the men treated them as women whose imagination had gotten the better of their judgment. Jesus had to come in person and show Himself to these obstinate men, whose pride had gotten the better of their judgment. Pride is the great obstacle to Faith. If a man were humble, he would have faith enough to move a mountain. (Matthew 17: 20, Mark 11: 23) By His appearance to the Apostles today, Christ wins the perfect faith of His disciples because it’s impossible not to recognize God in the patience, the majesty and the charity of the One Who stood before them.
            After Thomas affirmed his faith, saying, “My Lord and my God,” then for the instruction of persons of the rationalist class, like so many people of today, our Lord spoke the words to Thomas: “Blessed are they who have not seen, and have believed.” Thomas sinned in not having the readiness of mind to believe. We are in danger of committing that same sin unless our faith allows us to see everything with the eye of faith. When faith becomes our daily bread, our lives are changed for the good – in our jobs, with our friends and family - and they are changed forever.  God then provides us with a superabundance of understanding and joy. We can then look at everything that happens to us every day, both good and bad, and know that the entire universe is God’s miracle.
            Christ has died for us. Christ has risen, giving us the promise of eternal life if we do as He commands. Let’s learn from St. Paul how we can do that: “The night is passed, and the day is at hand. Let us therefore cast off the works of darkness, and put on the armour of light. Let us walk honestly, as in the day: not in rioting and drunkenness, not in chambering and impurities, not in contention and envy: But put ye on the Lord Jesus Christ . . .” (Romans: 13: 12-14) Our present life is full of trials, but Jesus said I will see you again, and your heart shall rejoice, and your joy no man taketh from you.
            We can ask about today's Gospel reading, how is it possible that Jesus entered into the room  with the doors shut as if He were a ghost, yet Thomas was able to touch Him? Is this so impossible for Him Who rose from the dead, and for Him who ate food with the disciples on the Road to Emmaus, and for Him who was born of a virgin? If you say you believe in God, then your faith is terribly weak if you still believe that human reason can provide all the answers. There would be nothing to wonder at in this Divine universe if all things could be grasped by reason alone.
            Today is the Octave of the Pasch, or the eighth day after Easter. The origin of the term Low Sunday is uncertain, but it is thought to indicate the contrast between today and the High Feast of Easter.  Today is also called Quasi modo Sunday, from the first words in the Introit,   “As new-born babes: [you should] desire the rational milk without guile.”The Church uses the words “as new-born” in reference to mankind’s renovation through the Resurrection, where now, as St. Paul tells us, we can “put on the new man.” (Ephesians 4: 24)
We Celebrate the Traditional Tridentine Latin Mass